Dating sites unethical dishonest fake profiles simple rule for dating my teenage daughter
According to the site's editor-in-chief, Annalee Newitz, the evidence overwhelmingly suggests Ashley Madison "is a site where tens of millions of men write mail, chat, and spend money for women who aren't there."Early news reports in the wake of the hack suggested that 90 to 95 per cent of the female accounts were fake, but little evidence was offered to support the theory.Gizmodo undertook a huge investigation of the dumped user data to work out if there was any truth in the figure."Out of 5.5 million female accounts, roughly zero per cent had ever shown any kind of activity at all, after the day they were created.""Ashley Madison was a far more dystopian place than anyone had realised," Newitz said."This isn't a debauched wonderland of men cheating on their wives.Almost all the female profiles on the illicit affairs dating site Ashley Madison were never used, according to a comprehensive data analysis by tech news website Gizmodo.The site ran numerous tests on stolen data leaked by hackers earlier this month and found that thousands of the profiles registered to people identifying as female appeared to be fake, and millions were never used at all.This pattern was supported by a scan of how many male and female members had engaged in chat.Roughly 11 million men had done so compared to just 2,400 women."Overall, the picture is grim indeed," Gizmodo said.
Ashley Madison, a dating website that helps people in long-term relationships have affairs, was attacked by a group of hackers calling themselves Impact Team.The group, which claims to be a "hacktivist" consortium, exposed the personal information of tens of millions of users after accusing Ashley Madison's parent company Avid Life Media of "fraud, deceit and stupidity".But the really damning evidence was discovered when Gizmodo looked into when each member had last checked his or her messages.The site discovered that approximately two-thirds of the men – 20.2 million of them – had checked into their messages at least once, whereas only 1,492 women on the entire database had ever checked their messages.Gizmodo filtered the data in several ways, looking at how many profiles were registered with an email address, suspicious patterns in the accounts' IP addresses and how frequently accounts were registered with unusual names or anomalous birthday details.
All of these searches suggested that among the profiles, there were at least several thousand fakes.