Dating services onlt
To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.It's not apparent why the existence of an article is a good basis to include or exclude.This article is within the scope of Wiki Project Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia.
It is a reviewed site unlike the other spamming sites.Shields020 (talk) , 13 January 2009 (UTC) Plentyof Fish is a Canadian site.If that is true, then CREATE the wiki page for the site that you like yourself. If it is truly notable someone else probably already created the page.Submit that separate page, get it approved by editors as relevant and NOTABLE (read WP: Note for reasoning), and then include it in the Online Dating Website wiki page. JVB (talk) , 13 November 2012 (UTC) We think we have something new and should be included here: Winked At is a social networking /dating site that offers total privacy: only people who have your code can connect to you and then you are still able to choose what you want to reveal.What about the sites that have a specific focus, and therefore are not terribly large -- but are highly relevant to those within that focus? Almost all of the remaining entries on this Talk page are nominations of pretty reasonable candidates for inclusion on the list -- and existence of a Wikipedia article seems really counter to making this list genuinely useful, as opposed to a plaything for Johann Vanbeek to revert.
Why limit this list to only sites that have a PR budget to maintain a Wikipedia page? Should existence of an article continue to be the threshold for inclusion/exclusion?